Most methods for learning with noisy labels require privileged knowledge such as noise transition matrices, clean subsets or pretrained feature extractors, resources typically unavailable when robustness is most needed. We propose Conformal Margin Risk Minimization (CMRM), a plug-and-play envelope framework that improves any classification loss under label noise by adding a single quantile-calibrated regularization term, with no privileged knowledge or training pipeline modification. CMRM measures the confidence margin between the observed label and competing labels, and thresholds it with a conformal quantile estimated per batch to focus training on high-margin samples while suppressing likely mislabeled ones. We derive a learning bound for CMRM under arbitrary label noise requiring only mild regularity of the margin distribution. Across five base methods and six benchmarks with synthetic and real-world noise, CMRM consistently improves accuracy (up to +3.39%), reduces conformal prediction set size (up to -20.44%) and does not hurt under 0% noise, showing that CMRM captures a method-agnostic uncertainty signal that existing mechanisms did not exploit.

Existing support vector machines(SVM) models are sensitive to noise and lack sparsity, which limits their performance. To address these issues, we combine the elastic net loss with a robust loss framework to construct a sparse $\varepsilon$-insensitive bounded asymmetric elastic net loss, and integrate it with SVM to build $\varepsilon$ Insensitive Zone Bounded Asymmetric Elastic Net Loss-based SVM($\varepsilon$-BAEN-SVM). $\varepsilon$-BAEN-SVM is both sparse and robust. Sparsity is proven by showing that samples inside the $\varepsilon$-insensitive band are not support vectors. Robustness is theoretically guaranteed because the influence function is bounded. To solve the non-convex optimization problem, we design a half-quadratic algorithm based on clipping dual coordinate descent. It transforms the problem into a series of weighted subproblems, improving computational efficiency via the $\varepsilon$ parameter. Experiments on simulated and real datasets show that $\varepsilon$-BAEN-SVM outperforms traditional and existing robust SVMs. It balances sparsity and robustness well in noisy environments. Statistical tests confirm its superiority. Under the Gaussian kernel, it achieves better accuracy and noise insensitivity, validating its effectiveness and practical value.

Tabular foundation models (TFMs) such as TabPFN (Tabular Prior-Data Fitted Network) are designed to generalize across heterogeneous tabular datasets through in-context learning (ICL). They perform prediction in a single forward pass conditioned on labeled examples without dataset-specific parameter updates. This paradigm is particularly attractive in industrial domains (e.g., finance and healthcare) where tabular prediction is pervasive. Retraining a bespoke model for each new table can be costly or infeasible in these settings, while data quality issues such as irrelevant predictors, correlated feature groups, and label noise are common. In this paper, we provide strong empirical evidence that TabPFN is highly robust under these sub-optimal conditions. We study TabPFN and its attention mechanisms for binary classification problems with controlled synthetic perturbations that vary: (i) dataset width by injecting random uncorrelated features and by introducing nonlinearly correlated features, (ii) dataset size by increasing the number of training rows, and (iii) label quality by increasing the fraction of mislabeled targets. Beyond predictive performance, we analyze internal signals including attention concentration and attention-based feature ranking metrics. Across these parametric tests, TabPFN is remarkably resilient: ROC-AUC remains high, attention stays structured and sharp, and informative features are highly ranked by attention-based metrics. Qualitative visualizations with attention heatmaps, feature-token embeddings, and SHAP plots further support a consistent pattern across layers in which TabPFN increasingly concentrates on useful features while separating their signals from noise. Together, these findings suggest that TabPFN is a robust TFM capable of maintaining both predictive performance and coherent internal behavior under various scenarios of data imperfections.

Deep linear networks (DLNs) are used as an analytically tractable model of the training dynamics of deep neural networks. While gradient descent in DLNs is known to exhibit saddle-to-saddle dynamics, the impact of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) noise on this regime remains poorly understood. We investigate the dynamics of SGD during training of DLNs in the saddle-to-saddle regime. We model the training dynamics as stochastic Langevin dynamics with anisotropic, state-dependent noise. Under the assumption of aligned and balanced weights, we derive an exact decomposition of the dynamics into a system of one-dimensional per-mode stochastic differential equations. This establishes that the maximal diffusion along a mode precedes the corresponding feature being completely learned. We also derive the stationary distribution of SGD for each mode: in the absence of label noise, its marginal distribution along specific features coincides with the stationary distribution of gradient flow, while in the presence of label noise it approximates a Boltzmann distribution. Finally, we confirm experimentally that the theoretical results hold qualitatively even without aligned or balanced weights. These results establish that SGD noise encodes information about the progression of feature learning but does not fundamentally alter the saddle-to-saddle dynamics.

In many classification problems, the costs of misclassifying observations from different classes can be highly unequal. The Neyman-Pearson multiclass classification (NPMC) framework addresses this issue by minimizing a weighted misclassification risk while imposing upper bounds on class-specific error probabilities. Existing NPMC methods typically assume that training labels are correctly observed. In practice, however, labels are often corrupted due to measurement error or annotation, and the effect of such label noise on NPMC procedures remains largely unexplored. We study the NPMC problem when only noisy labels are available in the training data. We propose an empirical likelihood (EL)-based method that relates the distributions of noisy and true labels through an exponential tilting density ratio model. The resulting maximum EL estimators recover the class proportions and posterior probabilities of the clean labels required for error control. We establish consistency, asymptotic normality, and optimal convergence rates for these estimators. Under mild conditions, the resulting classifier satisfies NP oracle inequalities with respect to the true labels asymptotically. An expectation-maximization algorithm computes the maximum EL estimators. Simulations show that the proposed method performs comparably to the oracle classifier under clean labels and substantially improves over procedures that ignore label noise.

Many modern machine learning models are trained to achieve zero or near-zero training error in order to obtain near-optimal (but non-zero) test error. This phenomenon of strong generalization performance for ``overfitted'' / interpolated classifiers appears to be ubiquitous in high-dimensional data, having been observed in deep networks, kernel machines, boosting and random forests. Their performance is consistently robust even when the data contain large amounts of label noise. Very little theory is available to explain these observations. The vast majority of theoretical analyses of generalization allows for interpolation only when there is little or no label noise. This paper takes a step toward a theoretical foundation for interpolated classifiers by analyzing local interpolating schemes, including geometric simplicial interpolation algorithm and singularly weighted $k$-nearest neighbor schemes. Consistency or near-consistency is proved for these schemes in classification and regression problems.

The growing importance of massive datasets with the advent of deep learning makes robustness to label noise a critical property for classifiers to have. Sources of label noise include automatic labeling for large datasets, non-expert labeling, and label corruption by data poisoning adversaries. In the latter case, corruptions may be arbitrarily bad, even so bad that a classifier predicts the wrong labels with high confidence. To protect against such sources of noise, we leverage the fact that a small set of clean labels is often easy to procure. We demonstrate that robustness to label noise up to severe strengths can be achieved by using a set of trusted data with clean labels, and propose a loss correction that utilizes trusted examples in a data-efficient manner to mitigate the effects of label noise on deep neural network classifiers. Across vision and natural language processing tasks, we experiment with various label noises at several strengths, and show that our method significantly outperforms existing methods.

We introduce collaborative learning in which multiple classifier heads of the same network are simultaneously trained on the same training data to improve generalization and robustness to label noise with no extra inference cost. It acquires the strengths from auxiliary training, multi-task learning and knowledge distillation. There are two important mechanisms involved in collaborative learning. First, the consensus of multiple views from different classifier heads on the same example provides supplementary information as well as regularization to each classifier, thereby improving generalization. Second, intermediate-level representation (ILR) sharing with backpropagation rescaling aggregates the gradient flows from all heads, which not only reduces training computational complexity, but also facilitates supervision to the shared layers. The empirical results on CIFAR and ImageNet datasets demonstrate that deep neural networks learned as a group in a collaborative way significantly reduce the generalization error and increase the robustness to label noise.

Noise in data significantly influences decision-making in the data science process. In fact, it has been shown that noise in data generation processes leads practitioners to find simpler models. However, an open question still remains: what is the degree of model simplification we can expect under different noise levels? In this work, we address this question by investigating the relationship between the amount of noise and model simplicity across various hypothesis spaces, focusing on decision trees and linear models. We formally show that noise acts as an implicit regularizer for several different noise models. Furthermore, we prove that Rashomon sets (sets of near-optimal models) constructed with noisy data tend to contain simpler models than corresponding Rashomon sets with non-noisy data. Additionally, we show that noise expands the set of "good" features and consequently enlarges the set of models that use at least one good feature. Our work offers theoretical guarantees and practical insights for practitioners and policymakers on whether simple-yet-accurate machine learning models are likely to exist, based on knowledge of noise levels in the data generation process.